Tag Archives: Academy Awards

Spotlight on Life of Pi by Yann Martel

I first read Life of Pi by Yann Martel in late 2001, and this lyrical story stole my heart.

Life of Pi is a masterful and utterly original novel that is at once the story of a young castaway who faces immeasurable hardships on the high seas, and a meditation on religion, faith, art and life that is as witty as it is profound. Using the threads of all of our best stories, Yann Martel has woven a glorious spiritual adventure that makes us question what it means to be alive, and to believe.

Growing up in Pondicherry, India, Piscine Molitor Patel – known as Pi – has a rich life. Bookish by nature, young Pi acquires a broad knowledge of not only the great religious texts but of all literature, and has a great curiosity about how the world works. His family runs the local zoo, and he spends many of his days among goats, hippos, swans, and bears, developing his own theories about the nature of animals and how human nature conforms to it. Pi’s family life is quite happy, even though his brother picks on him and his parents aren’t quite sure how to accept his decision to simultaneously embrace and practise three religions – Christianity, Hinduism, and Islam.

But despite the lush and nurturing variety of Pi’s world, there are broad political changes afoot in India, and when Pi is sixteen, his parents decide that the family needs to escape to a better life. Choosing to move to Canada, they close the zoo, pack their belongings, and board a Japanese cargo ship called the Tsimtsum. Travelling with them are many of their animals, bound for zoos in North America. However, they have only just begun their journey when the ship sinks, taking the dreams of the Patel family down with it. Only Pi survives, cast adrift in a lifeboat with the unlikeliest oftravelling companions: a zebra, an orang-utan, a hyena, and a 450-pound Royal Bengal tiger named Richard Parker.

Thus begins Pi Patel’s epic, 227-day voyage across the Pacific, and the powerful story of faith and survival at the heart of Life of Pi. Worn and scared, oscillating between hope and despair, Pi is witness to the playing out of the food chain, quite aware of his new position within it. When only the tiger is left of the seafaring menagerie, Pi realizes that his survival depends on his ability to assert his own will, and sets upon a grand and ordered scheme to keep from being Richard Parker’s next meal.

As Yann Martel has said in one interview, “The theme of this novel can be summarized in three lines. Life is a story. You can choose your story. And a story with an imaginative overlay is the better story.” And for Martel, the greatest imaginative overlay is religion. “God is a shorthand for anything that is beyond the material – any greater pattern of meaning.” In Life of Pi, the question of stories, and of what stories to believe, is front and center from the beginning, when the author tells us how he was led to Pi Patel and to this novel: in an Indian coffee house, a gentleman told him, “I have a story that will make you believe in God.” And as this novel comes to its brilliant conclusion, Pi shows us that the story with the imaginative overlay is also the story that contains the most truth.



Martel illustrates just how powerful stories can be and how they can save our lives.  Life of Pi is now a movie and is nominated for Best Picture in Sunday’s Academy Awards.

If you’ve never read Life of Pi, this is a great week to begin.  Oh, how I envy you!  How much do I love this book?  Well, I own a first edition, first printing signed, dated, and lined copy: “I was named after a swimming pool.”  I also own a first edition, first printing copy of the Canadian edition and an ARC.  The ARC is noteworthy because the tiger’s name is misprinted as Robert Parker.

Life of Pi is my favorite book of all-time.  If you’ve never read it, I urge you to open your heart and your mind to this stunning, magical story.



Filed under books

When the Movie is Better than the Book (REALLY!)

I do concede that it does not happen often; however, it does happen.

Sometimes the movie really is better than the book.

I can almost hear the high-pitched screams of my fellow book-lovers.  I can almost hear the gnashing of teeth.

Hear me out.

It can happen.  And when it does, the effect is almost magical.

And no, I’m not talking aboutThe Hunger Games.  I saw it Saturday but do not feel that the movie is better than Suzanne Collins’ novelization.  Certain scenes were done well, though, such as the Reaping…

But I digress.

I am a huge fan of Sideways (the movie, 2004).  With Thomas Haden Church, Sandra Oh, Virginia Madsen, and especially Paul Giamatti, Alexander Payne’s film was brilliant.  What made it stand out was the acting and the directing.

Sideways won an Academy Award for Best Adapted Screenplay, and this was well-deserved.

The cinematography in this film is particularly enjoyable for me.  I love the angles.  It’s a great movie.

But the novel by Rex Pickett was just mediocre.  It was only onscreen that I got a feel for the characters.  What was written on the pages of the book was simply rendered better on screen.

I feel the same way about another recent Alexander Payne-directed movie: The Descendants.  This surprises me, considering the fact that I’m no big fan of George Clooney.  Sure, he’s handsome, I admit to that.  But movies should be about more than eye-candy.  Clooney has made a career on playing himself.  He’s just George Clooney being George Clooney, with the exception of O Brother, Where Art Thou? (2000) and The Descendants (2011).

Yet Clooney shines in this film, as do his co-stars, Judy Greer and especially Shailene Woodley.

The panoramic, lush Hawaiian backdrop truly delivers on the big-screen.

I did not like Kaui Hart Hemmings’ novel.  I thought the pacing was slow and the characterization could have been better.

I felt the movie, though, should have took home the Academy Award for Best Picture.  It had a terrific ensemble cast.  The setting came to life and so did Clooney.

My last choice may be controversial.  It’s actually a tough one for me, considering I loved the novel.  In fact, it’s a favorite of mine.  I even love to re-read it, and fellow booklovers know that a reader cannot say that about every novel.

It is The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.  This movie blew me away.  It was everything I hoped for, plus some.  Rooney Mara, a virtual unknown, stole the show and literally became Lisabeth Salander.

Stieg Larsson’s novel crossed many genres.  Larsson created unforgettable characters, some of the best we will ever see on a page.

But the film took my breath away.  Even the usual stiff Daniel Craig gave a wonderful performance.

It certainly does not happen every day.  These are actually the only instances I could come up with when the movie is better than the book.  Yet it clearly does happen.  And when it does, well, it’s pure magic.

I’d love to hear from you.  Have you ever enjoyed a movie more than you liked the book?  If so, please share!


Filed under book review, books, fiction